Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 9 results ...

Faridi, A S and El-Sayegh, S M (2006) Significant factors causing delay in the UAE construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 24(11), 1167-76.

Li, X, Ogier, J and Cullen, J (2006) An economic modelling approach for public sector construction workload planning. Construction Management and Economics, 24(11), 1137-47.

Low, S P and Hongbin, J (2006) Analysing ownership, locational and internalization advantages of Chinese construction MNCs using rough sets analysis. Construction Management and Economics, 24(11), 1149-65.

Polat, G, Arditi, D, Ballard, G and Mungen, U (2006) Economics of on-site vs. off-site fabrication of rebar. Construction Management and Economics, 24(11), 1185-98.

Shiers, D, Rapson, D, Roberts, C and Keeping, M (2006) Sustainable construction: the development and evaluation of an environmental profiling system for construction products. Construction Management and Economics, 24(11), 1177-84.

Song, Y, Liu, C and Langston, C (2006) Extending construction linkage measures by the consideration of the impact of capital. Construction Management and Economics, 24(11), 1207-16.

Tam, C M, Tong, T K L and Chan, K K (2006) Rough set theory for distilling construction safety measures. Construction Management and Economics, 24(11), 1199-206.

Tam, V W Y, Tam, C M, Yiu, K T W and Cheung, S O (2006) Critical factors for environmental performance assessment (EPA) in the Hong Kong construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 24(11), 1113-23.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Environmental performance assessment; factor analysis; Hong Kong
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0144-6193
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190600799620
  • Abstract:

    With the rise in the public concern on environmental protection, more construction firms start to apply environmental management for their construction activities. As a result, environmental management systems (EMS) have been implemented in construction. However, to improve the construction environment in Hong Kong, environmental performance assessment (EPA) has been designed for reviewing, monitoring, checking and evaluating environmental performance. A list of evaluation factors for EPA are identified and grouped into seven major factors: management and training; air and noise; auditing; waste and water; cost saving on resources; energy; and regulation. The results from a survey highlight that the most important evaluation factor is management and training and the least significant result is regulation. A voluntary approach has been promoted instead of the traditional mandatory system. Furthermore, three case studies are used to test the reliability with seven groups of evaluation factors in measuring the environmental performance for construction. The results from the case study analysis proved the effectiveness of the developed environmental performance assessment. Therefore, the developed environmental performance assessment can benefit the construction industry and help to achieve continuous improvement on environmental performance.

Wiguna, I P A and Scott, S (2006) Relating risk to project performance in Indonesian building contracts. Construction Management and Economics, 24(11), 1125-35.